Thursday, May 17, 2007

Planned Parenthood covers up rape

Once again, Planned Parenthood has been caught attempting to cover up rape. A student reporter working undercover has exposed their effort to lie about her age to so that she could have an abortion. This is a big benefit to rapists looking to cover up the evidence.

The article also contained this interesting information. (More here)

Michigan pro-life sidewalk counselor Anne Norton compiled significant evidence of at least ten unreported child rape victims, including girls as young as 11-years-old, treated or given an abortion by the Planned Parenthood of South Central Michigan in Kalamazoo. Despite overwhelming evidence, including sworn affidavits, witness statements, and family interviews, local law enforcement has failed to act against the clinic’s unlawful cover-up.
Where's the "take back the night" crowd on this?

On a side note, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsberg has advocated the elimination of single-sex prisons. Can anyone think of a problem with that?

Will liberals condemn Planned Parenthood? Don't count on it.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

What disturbs me is why the parents who took their daughters there didn't report anything either.

Anonymous said...

Allan,

Never again call on liberals to do anything! You have not once admitted your mistakes and will never do so. You have no grounds to demand anything! You are as much of what is wrong with this country as all of the liberals you rail against. Why don't you hang out with AJ more and maybe you'd learn a little more about political discourse.

A.J. said...

I don't know if any liberals will condemn Planned Parenthood, but I know who won't. Barrack Obama won't because he got a 100 from Planned Parenthood last time around. Most pro-choicers wouldn't get that high of a rating, so to say that he is out of the maistream I believe is accurate. He can play the "articulate, clean" centrist if he wants, but as the elections draw nearer and he has to campaign on issues and stances rather than rhetoric, people will see through his extreme views and vote against him.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like someone is worried about Obama. I don't blame you though. Maybe if you actually had a candidate worth voting for things would be different. As such, you have to attack the other side because your best shot is a Giuliani (who, by the way, your side can't stand). So come to think of it, who's out of the mainstream again?

Anonymous said...

I'm a hard-core liberal and I don't want Obama in office (unless its at VP)

He has no foreign policy experience and hasn't been a senator for a full term.

He's just as unqualified as GWB was when he got elected out of Texas.

Anonymous said...

Here's another interesting note. I love your blurb about Ginsburg there Allan. You make it sound as if she did this yesterday when if fact the article was from 1974. Did you know Lynn Cheney wrote a novel called Sisters, which contained dipiction of a Lesbian relationship. Lynn Cheney must support Lesbianism then. Where is the WMUGOP on that issue?