Saturday, April 14, 2007

POLITICAL UPDATE--Global Warming

This update focuses on "global warming". Liberals continue to promote unscientific hysteria and suppress dissent from scientists. They want more government control of the economy. Warming is likely caused by the sun. A new documentary, The Great Global Warming Swindle, explains the truth about global warming.

Christopher Horner shows courts want more regulations.
Vasco Kohlmayer shows global warming empowers government.
Donald Miller explains the real cause of global warming.
Thomas Sowell reviews The Great Global Warming Swindle.
Christopher Horner explains the truth about global warming.
Ann Coulter shows how liberals suppress science.
Ann Coutler says that "global warming" is anti-human.

For more, watch The Great Global Warming Swindle.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yawn. It’s noteworthy though Allan that you’ve found a way to recycle…blog postings that is. Perhaps you’re really more green than you’re comfortable admitting in public. Basically though you have nothing new to add to this debate and no response to your critics do you? This blog has quickly stagnated. Hopefully other CRs with more interesting things to say will supplant your monotonous dribble.

A.J. said...

Yawn... It's noteworthy that YOU have found a way to recycle... comments whining about Allan's posts, that is.

If Allan's posts bore you, I apologize. If it's that bad, then stop reading. I am sick and tired of reading all these ridiculous "anonymous" comments when I have been commenting on the CD blog with my name. I have nothing to hide. If I disagree, then it should be known who I am so that discourse can ensue. Isn't that what those on our campus have been crying about all year? Then, people get their chance to get involved, and they don't put their name on their complaints. Grow up or stop reading our blog, it's that simple.

Anonymous said...

A.J.

As by far the most reasonable CR, surely you must know by now that it is obvious Allan does not care for dialogue. He does not engage his critics. He does not respond to them. He lets them comment (very reasonably until recently), lets the blogs fall out of view, and then writes in sometimes months later so it looks like he had the last word while his critics had no response.

It is commendable that you post with your name on the CD website. Again, as the most reasonable CR, your actions are laudable. Allan, however, is a different story. If he cannot engage his critics, what's the use of making one's self known? Market economics shows that the marginal benefit does not outweigh the potential costs.

Such is the state of your blog largely on his account.