America should stay out of the Syrian civil war.
Some people seem unable to comprehend that just because one side in a war is bad, it doesn't mean the other side is good. In this case, Assad, the secular dictator, is bad. The rebels, including various Islamic terrorist groups, are worse.
It is now alleged that Assad used chemical weapons. But while it seems to be generally agreed that chemical weapons were used, what is the evidence that Assad was the one to do so? What reason did he have to do so, when he had already killed plenty of people without them? In contrast, the rebels, or someone supporting them, would have had every reason to use them if they could provoke an American attack on Assad.
The arguments for war have been all too typical of democrat-led campaigns. Illogically limited, with no clear objective or plan. Even if striking Assad would be a good idea in principle, Obama and Kerry can't be trusted to pull it off right.
It would be different if there were a real chance of getting a better government in Syria. But there isn't. The slaughter in Syria is terrible. But the sad fact is that nothing is going to stop it. Stay the hell out.