Monday, February 15, 2010

Dave Pawloski is a Bad Person

Democrats use spat with conservative company for fundraising

Kalamazoo County Democrat Party Chair: A Real Classy Guy!

I passed your invitation onto our leadership and they collectively agreed to tell you to take your invitation fold it five ways and stick it where the moon don’t shine! PS: Your website violates campaign finance laws. Tell that to the derilict jack hoogydick and his cronies who are funding your rinky dink operation.
David C. Pawloski, Chair
Kalamazoo County Democratic Party
dpawloski@kzoodems.com
269-744-6774

For Immediate Release 2/5/10

Clarification of comments
David Pawloski calls on Gazette to correct the record. Neither I nor anyone in our organization believes the Balkema family or Best Way disposal are fascists. I hope there is no misunderstanding on that. If there is, please let me clarify myself. What I said is that there are elements of the Tea Party, who are supported by the Best Way ads, which agree with Glen Beck that the President hates white people, believe in Gov’t run Death Panels and President Obama is not a US citizen. Those people are the ones I was talking about. I challenge anyone to attend the rally this weekend and see the hatred being spread and the businesses profiting from it.

Dave Pawloski
dpawloski@kzoodems.com

----------------

Glenn Beck has never said that Obama is not a citizen. He has repeatedly said the opposite. But maybe 'Glen Beck' is a completely different person from Glenn Beck.

There was no 'hate' at the Reagan birthday party. There was love. Love for God, freedom, and the ideals that Reagan stood for.

P. S. Pawloski obviously went to public schools.

7 comments:

Roger said...

This sentence contains a provocative statement that attracts the readers’ attention, but really has very little to do with the topic of the blog post. This sentence claims to follow logically from the first sentence, though the connection is actually rather tenuous. This sentence claims that very few people are willing to admit the obvious inference of the last two sentences, with an implication that the reader is not one of those very few people. This sentence expresses the unwillingness of the writer to be silenced despite going against the popular wisdom. This sentence is a sort of drum roll, preparing the reader for the shocking truth to be contained in the next sentence.

This sentence contains the thesis of the blog post, a trite and obvious statement cast as a dazzling and controversial insight.

This sentence claims that there are many people who do not agree with the thesis of the blog post as expressed in the previous sentence. This sentence speculates as to the mental and ethical character of the people mentioned in the previous sentence. This sentence contains a link to the most egregiously ill-argued, intemperate, hateful, and ridiculous example of such people the author could find. This sentence is a three-word refutation of the post linked in the previous sentence, the first of which three words is “Um.” This sentence implies that the linked post is in fact typical of those who disagree with the thesis of the blog post. This sentence contains expressions of outrage and disbelief largely expressed in Internet acronyms.

This sentence implies that everyone reading has certainly seen the folly of those who disagree with the thesis of the blog post. This sentence reminds the reader that there are a few others who agree. This sentence contains one-word links to other blogs with whom the author seeks to curry favor, offered as examples of those others.

This sentence returns to the people who disagree with the thesis of the blog post. This sentence makes an improbably tenuous connection between those people and a current or former major political figure. This sentence links those people and that political figure to a broad, ill-defined sociodemographic class sharing allegedly similar belief systems. This sentence contains a reference to the teachings of Jesus; its intent may be either ironic or sincere.

This sentence refers to a different historic period, and implies that conditions relevant to the thesis of the blog post were either different or the same. This sentence states that the implications of the previous sentence are a damned shame. This sentence says that the next sentence will explain the previous sentence. This sentence contains a slight rewording of the thesis of the blog post, a trite and obvious statement cast as a dazzling and controversial insight.

This sentence contains an apparent non sequitur phrased as if it follows logically from the reworded thesis of the blog post. This sentence is a wildly overgeneralized condemnation of one or more entire classes of people phrased in as incendiary a fashion as possible which claims to be an obvious corollary to the thesis and non sequitur.

This sentence proposes that anyone who might disagree with the wildly overgeneralized condemnation is, by so disagreeing, actually proving the author’s point. This sentence explains that such people disagree primarily because of the author’s courageous, iconoclastic approach. This sentence mentions the additional possibilities that readers who express disagreement with the wildly overgeneralized condemnation are merely following political fashion or trying to ingratiate themselves with interest groups. This sentence is a somewhat related assertion based in thoughtless privilege and stated as dispassionate objective truth.

This sentence invites readers to respond freely and without constraint as long as those responses fall within certain parameters.

James Tyler said...

David sent this in a letter to me; I'm curious if he ever went to college... He actually typed "aint".
---
Take your childish ideas, fold them 5 ways, and stick them where the moon don't shine. You aint got the balls to debate shit, that's why you hide behind your website and throw bombs, just like a republican would! I can beat you on every one of your silly positions. When you decide to grow up, I'll be here. Oh, by the way, when your toast and washed up, I will still be here.

David C. Pawloski, Chair
Kalamazoo County Democratic Party

Roger said...

"P. S. Pawlowski obviously went to public schools."

Only a Republican attending a public university could miss such an obvious contradiction while making an insulting quip.

Palatine said...

Mr. Tyler,

I can't wait to hear the acclaim showered upon you after you finally receive that B.A. in Economics and Philosophy from WMU. IMPRESSIVE. It only took a university with open enrollment to make it this far. Perhaps you can find a grad school that doesn't require the GRE or official transcripts. My my, I can't wait to shake your hand.

James Tyler said...

Wow! I'm completely crushed by your comment, Mr. Anonymous/Palatine. IMPRESSIVE. Maybe you're the Republican that Mr. Pawloski was talking about. At least my education warranted basic grammar skills, something Mr. Pawloski can't say for himself as he doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're". You must be very proud of your esteemed leader. I have marketable skills, so graduate school is only really an option for me; my employment options are sufficient with or without it. Too bad Mr. Pawloski's screw-turning union job wasn't viable in the age of robotics. Perhaps then he wouldn't have so much free time to regurgitate every liberal cliché into what one can only assume he believes to be arguments. I'm curious, are you a former screw-turner as well? Well, I guess we'll never find out, Mr. Palatine, you anonymous bomb thrower, you. My, my, I cannot wait to shake your hand as well! Be sure to buy a copy of next book on Amazon or Barnes & Noble. I'm sure I'll be receiving more acclaim with this next book than from your however many years of dutiful servitude to the Democratic Party.

Palatine said...

Judging one's intelligence on grammatical ability fails when you make similar mistakes.

"Be sure to buy a copy of next book on Amazon or Barnes & Noble."

Perhaps you meant to say, "a copy of MY next book."

Regarding my anonymity:

I have not created a website filled with self-aggrandizing statements about myself. Nor have I created my own personal logo where I resemble a studded-dildo with a tie on (as you have). Is that what it means to be anonymous?

James Tyler said...

You've got me again, Mr. Palatine. Also, thank you for the dildo remark; it shows how mature you really are. Keep up your brilliant, pungent remarks! Oh yeah, I forgot to thank you for the traffic to my website. Every little bit increases my Google Pagerank - I am grateful. Let me know when I can grace you with my handshake.